The RAIC method is not as bad as you might think. It just takes a little practice and a lot of muscle memory. To succeed in legal research and writing, you need to master the writing format that the legal world expects. Whether you`re writing a memo or a letter, some form of RAIC format is used no matter where you work or study. The following papers have been developed to break down the components of the RAIC method and introduce new concepts that can make RAIC even better. Another tip is to wait until the rest of your piece is written before writing the output. Take the conclusion and condense it into a single sentence. Then all you have to do is end it with a frills in the form of a question mark. Probably every RAIC`s favorite part is the conclusion, because that means they`re almost done writing! As with any high school and college essay you`ve ever written, here you summarize all of your legal ideas. To reiterate, as a legal writer, you will be presented with a set of facts and will be asked to answer legal questions about them with a forward-looking or persuasive voice (unless your job involves drafting a law, will, or agreement that requires a different set of drafting, analytical, and planning skills). beyond the scope of this discussion). As a law student, you are sometimes asked to write something that deals with a narrow area (e.g., a short memo); Sometimes you will be asked to identify legal issues you can and resolve them (such as an answer to a certain type of exam question). More important legal issues can usually be broken down into a series of smaller questions, so you can divide each sub-question one by one, do „RAIC“, dispose of it, and then devote yourself fully to the next sub-question.
When you take sub-questions apart, you should define and organize them in a way that covers all relevant legal rules and allows the reader to follow them easily. A good legal analysis of a set of facts is usually structured as a series of RAIC entities (or CRRACC). This element represents the law or laws applicable in the particular case. Your conclusion should generally not exceed one paragraph and should address the legal issue again. If there is more than one issue, make sure each issue is resolved. The conclusion should also provide the expected legal decision. Some professors may not want to see this language – the question is if. they get the same result, for example, with other words „Did“ or „Can“. Don`t fixate on the tongue.
Follow your teacher`s instructions and find that in both cases you will get the same result: the identification of the legal problem. Finally, try to remember that the structure of the RAIC is a guideline and that all comments in this document are also guidelines. They exist to help you argue in a more orderly way and to allow this reasoning to be as understandable and accessible to your reader as possible. If you feel that applying any of these guidelines would create confusion in your letter, do not apply them; Sometimes it may be better to modify the proposed structure slightly. Your goal is to argue deeply and well-organized and write in a way that clearly conveys your argument. Their use of the RAIC should serve these purposes. When you submit a memo, the first thing your reader should see is the question you`re trying to answer. This question should be the question you are going to address, and your answer should cover all the important legal aspects of the question.
A good tip is to never use certain names. Keep it as general as possible. RAIC stands for the „Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion“ structure of legal analysis. An effective essay follows a form of RAIC structure in which it is organized around a „problem,“ a „rule,“ an „application,“ and a „conclusion“ for each individual problem and sub-problem identified as a legal problem. The RARACC is an elaborate form of RAIC: conclusion, rule, proof of rule, application, counter-argument, conclusion. The RR reminds you to state the relevant legal rule as you have synthesized it from sources of legal authority (i.e., constitutions, statutes, by-laws and decision-making or customary law), and then back up that rule statement with an organized explanation and discussion of the legal authority on which the rule statement is based (i.e., rule proof). The CC reminds you to make important counter-arguments, i.e.: Contrary approaches to how you synthesized the rule or applied it to your facts before formulating your conclusion. The topic is arguably the most important aspect of a legal document, as it sums up the legal issue at stake. Often referred to as an „explanation of the problem,“ the problem is written as a question and must address the main aspects of a legal issue. Never use details such as names in a problem statement, as this section is intended to ask a general legal question.